Maryland Criminal & Immigration Lawyer Blog

Deportation Cases, the Convention Against Torture, and the Proper Timing of Appeal Requests According to a New Supreme Court Ruling

June 30, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Immigration law, particularly that subset dealing with deportation, is a complex area that involves numerous procedural steps, filing requirements, supplemental documentation, and deadlines. Coming up short in any area may be fatal to your case and lead to your deportation, so the stakes are extraordinarily high. To ensure you receive the benefit of all the protections the law allows, you owe it to yourself to retain an experienced Maryland deportation defense lawyer to handle your case.

A recent U.S. Supreme Court case shows how complicated and confusing procedural issues related to deportation can be, especially when the immigrant alleges a fear of torture.

The individual at the center of the case, P.R., was a Jamaican man who entered the U.S. on a tourist visa in 1995 and remained in the country after the visa expired. The Department of Homeland Security took the man into custody in January 2021 and issued a final deportation order later that month.

The Sixth Amendment’s Guarantee of a ‘Public’ Trial — and How It May Help You in Your Maryland Case

June 16, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Sometimes, the key to a successful acquittal (or, in some matters, a successful reversal of a conviction) may have nothing to do with the facts of your case or the law of the crime charged. Your assault case may come down to things wholly unrelated to who struck whom with what and have no connection to the law of assault in Maryland. Many times, these issues relate to whether the police, the state, or the court violated your constitutional rights. Protecting your constitutional rights is one of the essential things a defense attorney can do for you when you are suspected or accused of a crime. So, whether you are being questioned or being tried, make sure you have an experienced Maryland criminal defense lawyer working for you.

Often, these violations relate to the rights protected by the Fourth Amendment. As a Silver Spring robbery case shows, your Sixth Amendment rights may also be vital to a successful appeal.

The Silver Spring case involved two men who allegedly robbed D.B. at gunpoint. The state tried both robbers together. As the trial began in Montgomery County in 2014, the judge decided to close the courtroom during the jury selection process. The judge made this decision “due to space limitations,” although the lawyers for both accused men stated their opposition to the closure.

Some Questions and Answers About the EB-5 Visa Program and the New ‘Gold Card’ Proposal

May 30, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Investor immigrants have, for many decades, had one primary pathway to permanent residency — the EB-5 visa. Recent statements from the Trump Administration indicate that this may change soon. The creation of new visas could mean new options and a need to adjust how one pursues permanent residency. If you are seeking to obtain a visa via the investment route, having a skilled Maryland investor visa lawyer advising you is vital… now more than ever.

On February 25, President Trump stated that the federal government planned to offer a new route to permanent resident status for investors. It is called the “Gold Card,” and it would offer lawful permanent resident status and the potential to achieve citizenship in exchange for a $5 million sum.

On May 21, Newsweek reported that the website for seeking Gold Cards would launch within “a matter of weeks.”

When the State May — and May Not — Use Your Conviction History Against You in a Maryland Criminal Trial

May 9, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Many people facing a criminal trial have a history with the system. Often, prosecutors want to use that criminal history to bolster their case. The fact that you have a criminal past does not prove that you committed a specific crime, and, recognizing that, the law substantially limits when the state can use your past criminal violations in your current case. If you have a criminal history and are currently facing charges, an experienced Maryland criminal defense lawyer can provide essential aid in protecting your right to a fair trial.

Take, for example, the criminal trial of S.M. from Baltimore. After S.M. fled from Baltimore police detectives who questioned him about a nearby car, the detectives opened the vehicle and found a loaded handgun. The state brought criminal charges because the man was disqualified from possessing a firearm.

In the gun case, the prosecution wanted to present to the jury evidence that, in 2017, the state convicted the man of possessing a large amount of drugs in violation of Section 5-612 of the Criminal Code.

A Look at Maryland Search and Seizure Law… and How the Law Can Sometimes Mirror Sports

April 23, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

This blog devotes a lot of space to the suppression of evidence before a trial of an accused person. That is because warrantless searches that violate your Fourth Amendment rights occur frequently, and the inclusion or exclusion of the evidence the police obtained in an illegal search or seizure may represent the difference between a conviction or an acquittal (or dismissal) of the charges against you. Given the importance of these arguments, it pays to ensure you have an experienced and effective Maryland criminal defense lawyer on your side when facing drug or weapons charges.

Take, for example, a recent evidence suppression case from Prince George’s County. The evidence the police obtained during a vehicle search was inadmissible at trial because the police lacked an appropriate basis for searching the interior of the defendant’s car.

In reaching that conclusion, the Appellate Court helpfully laid out some “ground rules” for what is — and what is not — a legal vehicle search. The court’s recitation of the law serves as a notable reminder of two things:

Small details (and differences) can matter a great deal in a search-and-seizure case, and
Search-and-seizure law concepts can sometimes be analogized to sports.

Withholding of Removal, the Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, and the Difference Between Withholding and Asylum

April 9, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

People across Maryland and around the country have followed with ever-increasing closeness the deportation case of Prince George’s County resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia. The case has brought several aspects of immigration law into the public eye. Most people are familiar with some of the terminology; other terms are likely new. While the issues surrounding this man’s deportation raise many important and unsettled questions, the controversy shows clearly that immigration matters can be complicated, intricate, and multi-layered. That is why, if you are facing deportation or other immigration action, you need a Maryland immigration lawyer on your side who possesses a complete and in-depth understanding of all aspects of immigration law.

Two of those terms are “asylum” and “withholding of removal.” People outside the community of immigration lawyers are more likely to be familiar with the former than with the latter. Today, we will examine both in some detail to help clarify the differences between them.

Asylum

Asylum specifically refers to a form of protection the U.S. grants to non-citizens who cannot return to their country of citizenship because doing so would place them at risk of persecution. To secure asylum, a non-citizen (or their attorney) must persuade an immigration judge not only that they fear persecution if returned to their country of citizenship, but that their fear is a “well-founded” one. A person may seek (and obtain) asylum whether they are documented or undocumented.

The Process of Voir Dire and Discovering Potential Jurors’ Biases for the Prosecution or Against the Defense

March 27, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

A criminal trial in Maryland is always a monumentally stressful situation, as your freedom often is on the line. One way to ensure you receive justice is to maximize the fairness of your trial, and one way to do that is through juror selection. Effectively executing the juror selection process helps ensure that the jury that decides your fate is impartial. Juror selection is one of the many settings — before, during, and after trial — where having a skilled Maryland criminal defense lawyer is vitally important.

A common problem accused people and defense attorneys face is the tendency among some prospective jurors to associate witnesses for the state (like police officers and experts testifying for the prosecution) with integrity and credibility and connect witnesses for the defense with untrustworthiness. Identifying and excluding those potential jurors is crucial to a fair trial and a successful defense.

That element of juror selection was central to a recent felony case from Baltimore. The defendant, R.A., was on trial for shooting a man during a June 2022 party at the city’s Inner Harbor. The state put him on trial for the shooting in 2023.

What the Columbia U. Protester’s Deportation Case Can Tell You About Deporting Green Card Holders

March 14, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Mid-March and the onset of springtime are often associated with one color more than most: green. That color represents the budding of new foliage and St. Patrick’s Day. For many immigrants, the color “green” has a different and more critical association — a green card. Recent events, however, have raised an important question: can I be deported if I have already gotten my green card? The short answer is yes, under certain circumstances. Whether you are a visa holder, a green card holder, or undocumented, a deportation action is something you must treat with the highest degree of care. That includes promptly retaining an experienced Maryland deportation defense lawyer.

In recent days, the federal government has begun steps to deport Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and a green card holder. Currently, the government is detaining the man in Louisiana.

Green card holders can be subject to deportation. Many times, the triggering event is a crime. For the government to deport a green card holder for a criminal violation, the crime must have been serious. The sorts of crimes that can lead to deportation include major drug crimes, fraud, or “aggravated felonies.” (This phrase refers to crimes such as child pornography, rape, murder, child sexual abuse, and human trafficking.)

The Visa Waiver Program, B-2 Travel Visas, and the 2026 World Cup

February 21, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

The majority of the non-English-speaking world calls it football, while most of the English-speaking world calls it soccer. Whatever you call it, it is the most popular team sport on the planet. The sport’s crown jewel event — the World Cup — is coming to the USA (as well as Canada and Mexico) next year. The volume of international travelers visiting the USA next year will be massive. For many, attending the World Cup will require navigating the often intricate and complicated world of travel visas. Whether you need a travel visa or another type of visa, ensuring you complete your application correctly the first time is crucial, which is why having representation from a Maryland travel visa lawyer is a must.

According to the FIFA (soccer’s governing body) website, nine of the top 16 national teams in the world call Europe home. South America is the second most represented continent, with four squads. Asia has one (Japan), and Africa has one (Morocco.) If you live in Japan or any of those nine European countries and want to attend World Cup matches in person, traveling to the USA is a comparatively simple process. Japan, Spain, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Portugal, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Croatia are among the 37 nations that participate in the Visa Waiver Program (VWP).

Citizens of these countries may spend up to 90 days in the USA without obtaining a visa. To travel without a visa, you must have approval from the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) before you embark on your journey. ESTA is an automated online tool that assesses your eligibility to travel to the USA.

What is (and is Not) Proper Justification for a Maryland Traffic Stop Based on a Driver’s Use of Cell Phone While Driving

February 14, 2025 | by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC

Driving in Maryland carries many potential risks. You could become involved in a crash, your vehicle could break down, … or the police could pull you over for a traffic violation and use that stop to find evidence of more significant crimes. In that last scenario, police sometimes overstep their bounds and engage in unconstitutional searches. When that happens, the difference between a conviction and an acquittal (or — even better — a dismissal) may be successfully getting the evidence from that search suppressed. Doing so usually means making a well-timed and well-worded pretrial motion. When it comes to this and other motions, representation provided by an experienced Maryland criminal defense lawyer is often an integral ingredient in a successful defense.

One problem in traffic stop situations is that people do not know their rights and may consent to things that the law gives them the right to refuse. A drug case from Hagerstown is a good example of this, as well as a scenario where the police overstepped.

M.S. was driving when a police officer spotted what, to the officer, looked like M.S. using the cell phone mounted to the front dash. Specifically, the officer testified that it looked like the driver was touching the phone with his right hand as he drove.